President election: J&Ok Meeting to overlook polls for 2nd time in historical past

Spread the love


Picture Supply : PTI/FILE

The assemblies of Assam, Nagaland and Jammu and Kashmir too couldn’t take part in subsequent elections on account of dissolution.

 

As India elects its subsequent president on July 18, the Legislative Meeting of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir won’t be part of the train for the second time within the historical past of the election to the highest constitutional put up.

There have been precedents of legislative assemblies of states not being a part of the presidential polls on account of their dissolution, the primary such occasion being of Gujarat in 1974.

The assemblies of Assam, Nagaland and Jammu and Kashmir too couldn’t take part in subsequent elections on account of dissolution.

Within the current case, the Legislative Meeting of Jammu and Kashmir is but to be constituted after the erstwhile state was bifurcated into the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in 2019.

The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act gives for a Legislative Meeting for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, however the election is but to be held as a consequence of numerous causes.

In 1974, Gujarat was within the throes of the Navnirman motion, which led to the dissolution of the state authorities headed by Chimanbhai Patel.

Towards the backdrop of calls for to postpone the presidential polls, a reference was made to the Supreme Courtroom to get its opinion and nip any controversy within the bud.

The apex courtroom had opined that the presidential polls needed to be held and accomplished in such time as could allow the president-elect to enter the workplace on the expiry of the time period of workplace of the outgoing president and due to this fact, the election needs to be held even when the Gujarat Legislative Meeting was not in existence then.

The Supreme Courtroom had famous that Article 54 of the Structure talked about the homes of Parliament and legislative assemblies just for the aim of displaying the {qualifications} of the members of the electoral faculty.

“The elected members of a dissolved legislative meeting of a state are now not members of the electoral faculty consisting of the elected members of each homes of Parliament and elected members of the legislative assemblies of the states and are, due to this fact, not entitled to solid votes on the presidential elections,” the highest courtroom had opined.

In 1992, the legislative assemblies of Jammu and Kashmir and Nagaland had been dissolved and thus, couldn’t be a part of the 10th presidential polls that elected Shankar Dayal Sharma to the highest constitutional put up.

In 1992, Jammu and Kashmir had gone unrepresented within the presidential polls because the election to the Lok Sabha too couldn’t happen within the erstwhile state in 1991 as a consequence of insurgency.

Nonetheless, within the July 18 presidential polls, 5 Lok Sabha members from the Union Territory — Farooq Abdullah, Hasnain Masoodi, Akbar Lone, Jugal Kishor Sharma and Jitendra Singh — are eligible to solid their votes.

In 1982, when Giani Zail Singh was elected because the president, the legislators from Assam couldn’t vote because the Meeting was dissolved. 

ALSO READ: ‘Proud second for Odisha’, says Naveen Patnaik on Droupadi Murmu as NDA’s choose for President

Newest India Information




Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »